
When we hear the word “default,” we often think of dramatic events like bankruptcies or terminations. However, the reality is that most Subcontract defaults are far less dramatic but no less impactful. A default is simply a failure to meet any contractual obligation, and many of these smaller incidents—what Maple Insight refers to as "micro defaults"—rarely result in termination. Instead, they generate hidden costs and inefficiencies that ripple through a project. In fact, data reveals that approximately one in four Subcontracts experience a default without necessarily being terminated or replaced. Understanding and addressing these risks is critical to protecting both individual projects and overall profitability.
The Hidden Costs of Micro Defaults
Defaults that fall short of requiring termination frequently lead to unexpected General Conditions expenses. A missed milestone, for instance, can set off a cascade of disruptions. If a Subcontractor falls behind schedule, the Construction Manager or General Contractor (CM/GC) may need to accelerate other trades or supplement the defaulted Subcontractor’s labor to get the project schedule back on track. This often necessitates off-hours labor, additional supervision, and standby trades, all of which increase costs. Even if acceleration is not necessary, other Subcontractors may need to either adjust their schedules or perform rework to accommodate the delayed progress.
While some of these expenses might be backcharged to the defaulting Subcontractor, disputes over the default or its associated costs can make full recovery difficult. CM/GCs must act swiftly to avoid colossal project delays, and often must direct workarounds that incur immediate expenses, despite the risk of non-recovery. When costs cannot be recouped, the shortfall often comes out of the CM’s fee, directly impacting profitability.
The Strain on Lean Teams
Beyond financial costs, micro defaults place an immense burden on already stretched project teams. To maximize efficiency, many projects operate with lean staffing levels, leaving little room for unexpected challenges. When defaults occur, they require additional oversight, coordination, and problem-solving—tasks that often exceed the bandwidth of the existing team.
This creates a difficult choice: the CM/GC must either add resources, increasing costs, or stretch current staff even thinner. Inattention increases the risk of delays and resultant potential penalties like liquidated damages and in either case, the project must absorb the unplanned expenses. Moreover, the stress and strain on team members can lead to inefficiencies and errors, compounding the problem further. Defaults, no matter how small, often have a way of escalating into broader issues that affect the entire project.
Mitigating the Impact of Defaults
Given the frequency and far-reaching effects of defaults, it’s essential to proactively address this risk. Relying solely on experience when building General Conditions budgets is no longer sufficient. Instead, we should leverage data to quantify potential default-related losses and incorporate those insights into our planning. By understanding the likely financial impact of defaults, CM/GCs can take a more strategic approach—whether through targeted mitigation efforts, enhanced contractual protections, or by allocating resources to buffer against unexpected events.
Ultimately, the goal of any business is to protect its profit margin. Anticipating and insulating against default-related losses is not just good risk management—it’s smart business. Projects that proactively account for these risks are better positioned to absorb the unforeseen and maintain financial stability.
Defaults are an unavoidable reality in construction, but they don’t have to be a source of unchecked financial loss. By acknowledging their prevalence and understanding their hidden costs, CM/GCs can take meaningful steps to protect their projects and their bottom line. Micro defaults may seem minor in isolation, but their cumulative effect can be significant. With proactive planning and a focus on mitigating risks, we can transform defaults from a disruptive liability into a manageable aspect of project execution. Protecting profitability starts with recognizing and addressing the true financial impact of Subcontract defaults.
Completely Unrelated Trivia Treasure: The Library of Congress is the largest library in the world with over 175 million items in the collection. Each day, the Library of Congress staff adds more than 10,000 new items to its collection.
Maple Insight provides Subcontractor default loss prediction and estimation services, helping CM/GCs identify and mitigate future risks before they impact the project schedule or budget.