Subcontractor risk scores can simplify complex decisions—but only if they’re done right. This article breaks down the five most common mistakes in subcontractor risk scoring, from outdated data to overreliance on single metrics, and offers practical fixes to help you build a smarter, stronger, and more defendable risk process.

Risk scoring is only as strong as the data and context behind it. Too often, contractors and risk managers rely on outdated numbers, overweight single metrics, or treat scores like predictions instead of insights. In this article, Maple Insight breaks down the five most common subcontractor risk scoring mistakes—and how to avoid them—so your decisions are accurate, consistent, and defensible.

Many prequalification processes fail not because of subcontractors, but because the system itself is flawed. From outdated SOPs to one-size-fits-all evaluations to vague risk labels, broken processes put projects at risk. Here’s how to spot the pitfalls and fix them with sharper, data-driven approaches.

Think your prequal process is working? Think again. If your risk assessment tool can't deliver reliable results, you're flying blind. Discover the 3 silent saboteurs built into many prequalification workflows — and how to turn checkbox culture into decision-making clarity.

In today’s fast-paced construction environment, speed is essential—but so is clarity. Owners and CM/GCs are under pressure to make procurement decisions quickly. Without a clear procurement risk assessment strategy, projects can stall or derail. Maple Insight explores how financializing risk empowers faster, smarter decisions that align with owner expectations.